Comments on: Fear of Obama Spurs Record Weapons Sales http://ataw.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/fear-of-obama-spurs-record-weapons-sales/ Professional, Polite, Prepared to Kill Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:46:54 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Jedifrog http://ataw.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/fear-of-obama-spurs-record-weapons-sales/#comment-1213 Jedifrog Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:27:13 +0000 http://ataw.wordpress.com/?p=1765#comment-1213 In response Valerie Curl: You sound like an Un-informed Lib, Auto wpns are for anyone not Soldiers or killers. People kill not guns. I shouldnt have to register my ammo purchases with anyone, thats not freedom, so go ahead give an inch to the almighty GOV'T they will gladly impose upon people with your logic. 2ND Amendment Prevails In response Valerie Curl:

You sound like an Un-informed Lib, Auto wpns are for anyone
not Soldiers or killers. People kill not guns. I shouldnt
have to register my ammo purchases with anyone, thats not
freedom, so go ahead give an inch to the almighty GOV’T
they will gladly impose upon people with your logic.

2ND Amendment Prevails

]]> By: Valerie Curl http://ataw.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/fear-of-obama-spurs-record-weapons-sales/#comment-1102 Valerie Curl Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:18:34 +0000 http://ataw.wordpress.com/?p=1765#comment-1102 Two comments: 1) The Send Amendment is a U.S. Constitutional Amendment. To change it requires a 2/3 majority of the States to change it. Not bloody likely. 2) Setting up restrictions on ammunition purchases. By registering ammo purchases, law enforcement can determine much more easily who bought ammo in the case of shooting death. It doesn't restrict law-abiding hunters. So, what is wrong with helping law-enforement find and prosecute murderers? 3) My own question, not Obama's: why would anyone want to own automatic weapons? They are meant only for people killing, not hunting. Owning them doesn't make sense...and I was raised by a father who owned both a shotgun and rifle for hunting. Two comments:

1) The Send Amendment is a U.S. Constitutional Amendment. To change it requires a 2/3 majority of the States to change it. Not bloody likely.

2) Setting up restrictions on ammunition purchases. By registering ammo purchases, law enforcement can determine much more easily who bought ammo in the case of shooting death. It doesn’t restrict law-abiding hunters. So, what is wrong with helping law-enforement find and prosecute murderers?

3) My own question, not Obama’s: why would anyone want to own automatic weapons? They are meant only for people killing, not hunting. Owning them doesn’t make sense…and I was raised by a father who owned both a shotgun and rifle for hunting.

]]>