Professional, Polite, Prepared to Kill

Obama’s Ignorance of Private Contractors

Just one more reason why we don’t need Barack Hussein Obama from Rush Limbaugh:
RUSH:  All right, listen to these on the radio.  Now, these have nothing to do with economics.  This is July 2nd, eight days ago out in Colorado Springs. Obama is speaking to the editorial board of the Military Times. There’s no teleprompter out there and no little wireless mike from campaign headquarters telling him what to say.  The editor here says, “The size of our military has really been built on the military’s ability to be effective. It’s built very heavily on National Guard, very heavily on private contractors to provide everything from food service to aircraft service and gun-toting security.  What are the proper rules for those different pieces and how should that change?”  Now, he interprets this to be a question. When he heard private contractors, he heard Blackwater, that’s the knee-jerk reaction.  He wasn’t thinking of Kellogg Brown & Root who does the food services for Halliburton. He wasn’t thinking of Halliburton. He was thinking of Blackwater, those evil, murdering mercenaries who make more than our brave troops.  You know, the left has their knee-jerk reactions, Blackwater, and they seethe.  Say Halliburton or Cheney, and they get suicidal.  So here is Obama and his answer.

OBAMA:  When it comes to private contractors, there is room for private contractors working a mess hall, you know, providing basic supplies and — and doing some, uh, logistical work that might have been done in house in the past.  I am troubled by the use of private contractors when it comes to, uh, potential armed engagement.  I think it puts our troops at harm’s way, I think it creates some difficult morale issues when you’ve got private contractors who are getting paid ten times what an Army private is getting paid for work that is as risk — carries similar risk, when it comes to our Special Forces, what we’ve seen as a potential drain of — of our — some of our best trained Special Forces, and you can’t blame them if they can make so much more working for Blackwater than they can working as, uh, as a master sergeant.  So the — you know, that, I think, is — that, I think, is a problem.

RUSH:  I don’t think he understands who Blackwater is.  I don’t think he understands what they do.  They do not engage in combat operations per se.  They’re a security outfit.  When I went to Afghanistan, there was a crew of these guys. I had never heard of Blackwater at the time I was there, but these guys were former Special Forces.  They had done their time, they had done their duty, and these guys, they were take no prisoners kind of guys, and they were secure, and they were armed to the hilt, and they drove the SUVs as we corkscrewed through downtown Kabul on our way to various sites, and you thanked God they were there.  Now, in Kandahar, I did talk to one of the officers there who did point out that it was a problem when these guys are on the base because they are making six figures versus the enlisted people, but he said it is what it is, and we have to deal with it, but there’s something else that was sinister in Obama’s answer here, and it’s just to me, like the veterans bill that he rags McCain on for not supporting. It was loaded up with pork, drain enlisted troops out of the service, and now he’s complaining about private contractors draining enlisted troops out of the service, which is not what happens.  So then the unidentified editor says, “Well, Blackwater would argue that they’re a bargain, that you get a higher level of ability, they can put people there. They can keep top level talent there perpetually.”

OBAMA:  I’m not arguing that there are never going to be uses for private contractors in some circumstances.  What I am saying is if you start building a military premised on the use of private contractors, and you start making decisions about armed engaged based on the availability of private contractors to fill holes in gaps, that over time you are, I believe, eroding the core of our military’s relationship to the nation and how accountability is structured.

RUSH:  This is crazy.

OBAMA:  You are privatizing something that is what essentially sets a nation state apart, which is the monopoly on — on violence, uh, and to set those kinds of precedents I think will lead us over the long term into, uh, some troubled waters.

RUSH:  He doesn’t know what he is talking about now.  He is strictly wandering aimlessly in vain search of a cogent thought.  He wasn’t even coherent there.  We played these bites because the caller said, “Do you think he understood anything in college about pro-market economics, did he read anything that was pro-market economics?”  This is embarrassing.  He had no idea what he was talking about here.  You heard it.  A nation state should have a monopoly on violence via its military.  And if you’re going to have these private contractors to fill holes and gaps you’re going to erode the core of the military’s relationship to the nation and how accountability is structured.  What about winning?  Yeah.  Of course, it’s not defense, either.  That’s exactly right.  We’re not talking about people who are in the military, by hook or by crook, who cares how, who are defending the military violence, and as president he wants a monopoly on the violence of this country.  Military action is just violence.  I guarantee you you learn that in his elitist Ivy League classrooms as well.


July 10, 2008 - Posted by | Iraq, Politics | , , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: